The question of body and mind - a historical review and taking a stand | psychological blog
3.2 The dual approach
Rene Dkrt (1596 1650) tried to address these questions in the 17th century was Asnsielist [1]. Physical ideas were based on intuitive ideas, like the idea that defined the nature of the body as a volume spaces. Rationalist bothell Descartes believed that his intuition about the reliability of the material as well as for the soul, should be supported by intuitive insights given to him by god.
Hfrllisteim (which you see in body and soul parallel entities) solved the paradox rooted in mutual influence of two seemingly different entities substantially different way. They claimed that everything in nature: the thinking part and the Hmcani are reflections of the same entity that god (or delegated god) embodied in a living organism. Therefore, since both a reflection of the same, then there can be absolutely mutual influence between them.
Monad is a kind of divine spiritual bothell being delegated an autonomous existence and ontological and spiritual Take your atoms is characterized by simplicity. It does not occupy a place in space but is fundamental to all the sea-Take your universe. Monad is a creature of nature and was created by god. Nature itself capable of producing only compounds of Monads. According to Leibniz atom and the whole material are compounds that may Monads infinite in number. bothell Under this approach, bothell the atom can not be used basic element that can not be distributed because:
So, apparently, Leibniz solved the problem of body and mind in a seemingly elegant. bothell In our view, the solution is not likely metaphysical aspect (there is a mythological religious -hmonada which is a complex and diverse capabilities unexplained and it is not simple, bothell neither reasonable nor cost-effective premises, as required metaphysics appropriate).
Fofr and Akls presented in their book "self and its brain", the main approaches that have always accepted this issue. They also expressed their views clearly bothell Llachioon Teorit identity. By Teorit identity synonymous between electro-chemical processes that occur in the brain and mental processes.
According Teorit identity, the mind works through the nervous system reactions. The high neural activity centers and states of mind are one and the same. Therefore, our mental processes become clear, when we study them in depth, as a derivative of electrochemical bothell processes in the brain.
In accordance with this, there is a world of processes taking place in the physical world (physical world) .In addition it has another world of psychic bothell phenomena, resulting from the above processes and perceived through inter-Sfktibi process carried out by us through which brain mechanisms (mental world).
So far, there is no problem in excess of the interaction between the two worlds. Mental world and the physical world can operate autonomously in separate worlds, bothell even though the source of both is one and the same. Content worlds separate stem in part also different ways of looking at the same phenomenon bothell itself carried out by us - through empirical observation and through inter-Sfktibit observation.
Therefore, bothell we can affect the mental phenomena through electrochemical methods such as taking psychiatric drugs or ECT, as much as we can affect the biochemistry of the brain by thinking thoughts and creating experiences as occurs, for example, during psychotherapy.
There are different modes of perception of the real thing. In our opinion, this concept Maosst and Taoss future bothell research and clinical experience bothell that will prove the equivalence between an electro-chemical measurements of physiological brain-and inter-Sfktzih of mental processes.
Beyond that already has a body of knowledge that allows, on the one hand to solve psychological problems through chemical processes such as medications, and other chemical processes in the brain change through mental treatment. For example, bothell treatment of depression is possible through psychotherapy and as a result, created a proven, change the brain's biochemistry and feeling alike. Proven mutual influences are clear, prima facie constitute additional support to Teorit identity.
Despite the attractiveness of this approach that looks almost for granted, there will still like say in the real world and the objective world there is still only physiological and physical and mental activity is nothing but an illusion created by the brain as a result of certain physiological processes.
Fofr seriously questioned the possibility to create those machines. Contrary to Fofr, we are convinced that you can create an experience capable machines and consciousness. However, it should be noted that to this day has not been achieved sufficient understanding of the mechanism for consciousness, consciousness, thinking, etc., so that there is still a sufficient knowledge to create such robots.
- Simplification, since, like many other problems that also which we find it difficult bothell to solve, there is an escape easy solution. Moving the focus of the problem deity or higher organisms, gives immediate and seemingly reasonable explanation for this phenomenon is not understood but from the depth does not contribute anything in order to understand and explain the phenomenon.
There is a myth-story Legends beautiful and soothing. However, there should be a person with a lot of faith and good will to believe bothell in it (it is important to note that modern bothell religions and even church today receive bothell the theory of evolution. The Pope has apologized for the abuse referred to it in the past. In principle, there is no theory of evolution contradicts faith in God abstract).
In addition, recognition, thinking and conceptualization unique mechanisms not only to man, but they are also characteristics of various animals. As you go more phylogenetic bothell scale [4] no longer possible to ignore the striking similarity between our brain processes and brain processes of terrestrial animals bothell and sea, headed by Primate [5]. In this context, one may ask: Do primates are the result of fertilization of the great apes monkeys were violent people?
The most disturbing point is that despite the accumulated knowledge of our present physiology of the brain, at this stage we still have no way to explain the nature of human experience including recruitment issue mushroomed basic sensory
3.2 The dual approach
Rene Dkrt (1596 1650) tried to address these questions in the 17th century was Asnsielist [1]. Physical ideas were based on intuitive ideas, like the idea that defined the nature of the body as a volume spaces. Rationalist bothell Descartes believed that his intuition about the reliability of the material as well as for the soul, should be supported by intuitive insights given to him by god.
Hfrllisteim (which you see in body and soul parallel entities) solved the paradox rooted in mutual influence of two seemingly different entities substantially different way. They claimed that everything in nature: the thinking part and the Hmcani are reflections of the same entity that god (or delegated god) embodied in a living organism. Therefore, since both a reflection of the same, then there can be absolutely mutual influence between them.
Monad is a kind of divine spiritual bothell being delegated an autonomous existence and ontological and spiritual Take your atoms is characterized by simplicity. It does not occupy a place in space but is fundamental to all the sea-Take your universe. Monad is a creature of nature and was created by god. Nature itself capable of producing only compounds of Monads. According to Leibniz atom and the whole material are compounds that may Monads infinite in number. bothell Under this approach, bothell the atom can not be used basic element that can not be distributed because:
So, apparently, Leibniz solved the problem of body and mind in a seemingly elegant. bothell In our view, the solution is not likely metaphysical aspect (there is a mythological religious -hmonada which is a complex and diverse capabilities unexplained and it is not simple, bothell neither reasonable nor cost-effective premises, as required metaphysics appropriate).
Fofr and Akls presented in their book "self and its brain", the main approaches that have always accepted this issue. They also expressed their views clearly bothell Llachioon Teorit identity. By Teorit identity synonymous between electro-chemical processes that occur in the brain and mental processes.
According Teorit identity, the mind works through the nervous system reactions. The high neural activity centers and states of mind are one and the same. Therefore, our mental processes become clear, when we study them in depth, as a derivative of electrochemical bothell processes in the brain.
In accordance with this, there is a world of processes taking place in the physical world (physical world) .In addition it has another world of psychic bothell phenomena, resulting from the above processes and perceived through inter-Sfktibi process carried out by us through which brain mechanisms (mental world).
So far, there is no problem in excess of the interaction between the two worlds. Mental world and the physical world can operate autonomously in separate worlds, bothell even though the source of both is one and the same. Content worlds separate stem in part also different ways of looking at the same phenomenon bothell itself carried out by us - through empirical observation and through inter-Sfktibit observation.
Therefore, bothell we can affect the mental phenomena through electrochemical methods such as taking psychiatric drugs or ECT, as much as we can affect the biochemistry of the brain by thinking thoughts and creating experiences as occurs, for example, during psychotherapy.
There are different modes of perception of the real thing. In our opinion, this concept Maosst and Taoss future bothell research and clinical experience bothell that will prove the equivalence between an electro-chemical measurements of physiological brain-and inter-Sfktzih of mental processes.
Beyond that already has a body of knowledge that allows, on the one hand to solve psychological problems through chemical processes such as medications, and other chemical processes in the brain change through mental treatment. For example, bothell treatment of depression is possible through psychotherapy and as a result, created a proven, change the brain's biochemistry and feeling alike. Proven mutual influences are clear, prima facie constitute additional support to Teorit identity.
Despite the attractiveness of this approach that looks almost for granted, there will still like say in the real world and the objective world there is still only physiological and physical and mental activity is nothing but an illusion created by the brain as a result of certain physiological processes.
Fofr seriously questioned the possibility to create those machines. Contrary to Fofr, we are convinced that you can create an experience capable machines and consciousness. However, it should be noted that to this day has not been achieved sufficient understanding of the mechanism for consciousness, consciousness, thinking, etc., so that there is still a sufficient knowledge to create such robots.
- Simplification, since, like many other problems that also which we find it difficult bothell to solve, there is an escape easy solution. Moving the focus of the problem deity or higher organisms, gives immediate and seemingly reasonable explanation for this phenomenon is not understood but from the depth does not contribute anything in order to understand and explain the phenomenon.
There is a myth-story Legends beautiful and soothing. However, there should be a person with a lot of faith and good will to believe bothell in it (it is important to note that modern bothell religions and even church today receive bothell the theory of evolution. The Pope has apologized for the abuse referred to it in the past. In principle, there is no theory of evolution contradicts faith in God abstract).
In addition, recognition, thinking and conceptualization unique mechanisms not only to man, but they are also characteristics of various animals. As you go more phylogenetic bothell scale [4] no longer possible to ignore the striking similarity between our brain processes and brain processes of terrestrial animals bothell and sea, headed by Primate [5]. In this context, one may ask: Do primates are the result of fertilization of the great apes monkeys were violent people?
The most disturbing point is that despite the accumulated knowledge of our present physiology of the brain, at this stage we still have no way to explain the nature of human experience including recruitment issue mushroomed basic sensory
